Open Access

Autoimmune hepatitis-specific antibodies against soluble liver antigen and liver cytosol type 1 in patients with chronic viral hepatitis

  • Eirini I Rigopoulou1,
  • Maria Mytilinaiou1,
  • Ourania Romanidou1,
  • Christos Liaskos1, 2 and
  • George N Dalekos1Email author
Journal of Autoimmune Diseases20074:2

DOI: 10.1186/1740-2557-4-2

Received: 19 October 2006

Accepted: 04 February 2007

Published: 04 February 2007

Abstract

Background

Non-organ specific autoantibodies are highly prevalent in patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV). Among them, anti-liver kidney microsomal type 1 (LKM1) antibody – the serological marker of type 2 autoimmune hepatitis (AIH-2)- is detected in up to 11% of the HCV-infected subjects. On the other hand, anti-liver cytosol type 1 antibodies (anti-LC1) – either in association with anti-LKM1, or in isolation- and anti-soluble liver antigen antibodies (anti-SLA) have been considered as useful and specific diagnostic markers for AIH. However, their specificity for AIH has been questioned by some recent studies, which have shown the detection of anti-LC1 and anti-SLA by immunoprecipitation assays in HCV patients irrespective of their anti-LKM1 status. The aim of the present study was to test the anti-LC1 and anti-SLA presence by specific enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), in a large group of Greek HCV-infected patients with or without anti-LKM1 reactivity as firstly, immunoprecipitation assays are limited to few specialized laboratories worldwide and cannot be used routinely and secondly, to assess whether application of such tests has any relevance in the context of patients with viral hepatitis since antibody detection based on such ELISAs has not been described in detail in large groups of HCV patients.

Methods

One hundred and thirty eight consecutive HCV patients (120 anti-LKM1 negative and 18 anti-LKM1 positive) were investigated for the presence of anti-LC1 and anti-SLA by commercial ELISAs. A similar number (120) of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infected patients seronegative for anti-LKM1 was also tested as pathological controls.

Results

Six out of 18 (33%) anti-LKMpos/HCVpos patients tested positive for anti-LC1 compared to 1/120 (0.83%) anti-LKMneg/HCVpos patients and 0/120 (0%) of the anti-LKM1neg/HBVpos patients (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). Anti-SLA antibodies were not present in any of the HCV (with or without anti-LKM1) or HBV-infected patients.

Conclusion

We showed that anti-LC1 and anti-SLA autoantibodies are not detected by conventional assays in a large group of anti-LKM1 negative patients with chronic hepatitis B and C infections. Based on these results we cannot find any justification for the application of anti-LC1 and anti-SLA tests in the routine laboratory testing of viral hepatitis-related autoantibody serology with the only potential exception being the anti-LC1 screening in anti-LKM1pos/HCVpos patients.

Background

Non-organ specific autoantibodies (NOSA), particularly smooth muscle antibodies (SMA) and antinuclear (ANA) antibodies are highly prevalent in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection [17]. Anti-liver kidney microsomal type 1 (LKM1) antibody – the serological marker of type 2 autoimmune hepatitis (AIH-2)- is also detected in up to 11% of the HCV-infected subjects [1, 811]. Anti-liver cytosol type 1 (LC1) antibodies have originally been described either in association with anti-LKM1, or in isolation, and in both instances define a clinical entity indistinguishable from AIH-2 [12, 13]. Anti-LC1 has also been found occasionally in anti-LKM1 positive chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected patients [10, 14]. Detection of anti-soluble liver antigen antibodies (anti-SLA) was initially considered to identify a third type of AIH seronegative for the conventional ANA, SMA, anti-LKM1 autoantibodies [15] but recent studies indicate that it can also be present in conjunction with other AIH-specific antibodies suggesting that anti-SLA is rather an additional important marker for the diagnosis of type 1 AIH, than a marker of a third type of AIH [11, 1619].

Hence, anti-LC1 and anti-SLA autoantibodies appear useful diagnostic markers for AIH but their accurate detection was until recently hampered by the fact that anti-LC1 is obscured by the concurrent presence of anti-LKM1 using the indirect immunofluorescence (IIFL) routine screening, while anti-SLA are undetectable by IIFL [911]. In recent years, the molecular targets of anti-LC1 and anti-SLA have been identified as formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase (FTCD) and UGA tRNA suppressor associated antigenic protein (tRNP(Ser)Sec), respectively and commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for their detection have become available [9, 2025]. Their specificity for AIH, however, has been questioned by studies from the group of Alvarez [26, 27]. By immunoprecipitation of radiolabeled human FTCD, Beland et al have found that anti-FTCD antibodies are present in 10% of anti-LKM1 positive and 15% of anti-LKM1 negative chronic HCV infected patients [26]. Of interest and using a similar approach, the same group has detected anti-SLA antibodies in 28% of anti-LKM1 positive and in 12% of anti-LKM1 negative HCV infected patients [27]. These findings challenge the prevailing notion that antibodies against human FTCD and tRNP(Ser)Sec are highly specific for autoimmune liver diseases [2025, 28, 29]. According to the authors of the abovementioned studies [26, 27], anti-LC1 and anti-SLA autoantibodies can be regarded as serological markers of autoimmunity and need to be tested when investigating autoimmunity, especially in chronic HCV infection.

Immunoprecipitation assays, however, are limited to few specialized laboratories worldwide and cannot be used routinely. Indeed, most of the non-specialized laboratories have started making use of kit-based semi-automated commercial anti-LC1 and anti-SLA ELISAs. The question as to whether application of such tests has any relevance in the context of patients with viral hepatitis still remains unanswered, as antibody detection based on such ELISAs has not been described in detail in large groups of patients with chronic viral hepatitis B and C.

The aim of the present study was to test anti-FTCD (anti-LC1) and anti-tRNP(Ser)Sec (anti-SLA) antibodies, in a large number of Greek HCV-infected patients with or without anti-LKM1 seropositivity. A similar number of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infected patients was also tested as pathological controls. We were able to show that there is no reason for additional routine laboratory testing for anti-LC1 and anti-SLA antibodies in HCV-infected patients unless there are anti-LKM1 antibodies present.

Methods

Patients

One hundred and twenty consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis C (mean age 47 ± 12.3 standard deviation (SD) years; 62 female), seronegative for anti-LKM1 (anti-LKMneg/HCVpos) by IIFL followed at the Department of Medicine, Academic Liver Unit, University of Thessaly Medical School were studied. The diagnosis of chronic HCV infection was based on: (a) detection of anti-HCV antibodies using a third-generation ELISA (Murex Diagnostics, Temple Hill, Dartford, UK) at least twice within 6 months before their enrolment into the study; and (b) active virus replication as defined by the detection of HCV RNA using a commercially available qualitative PCR kit (HCV Monitoring Cobas Amplicor, Roche, Geneva, Switzerland), as described previously [1, 2, 30]. At the time of serum sample collection, 45 patients had completed antiviral treatment with alpha-interferon (IFN-a) alone or in combination with ribavirin. All patients were negative for the following viral markers tested using commercial kits (Abbott Diagnostic Kits, North Chicago, IL, USA): Hepatitis B surface Antigen (HBsAg), anti-HBsAg antibody (anti-HBs), anti-Hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), and anti-human immunodeficiency virus (anti-HIV, VIDAS HIVDUO Bio MER©IEUX, Marcy-l'Etoile, France). Histological, serological and clinical details of these patients have been described in previous reports [1, 2, 30]. The results obtained by ELISA testing of the anti-LKM1 negative patients with hepatitis C were compared to those obtained by testing of 18 anti-LKM1pos/HCVpos patients (mean age 47 ± 11.3 years; 12 female) and 120 anti-LKM1neg/HBVpos Greek patients (mean age 49.1 ± 11.2; 81 male) all HBV-DNA positive by a sensitive PCR kit (HBV Monitor Cobas Amplicor, Roche; cut-off: 200 copies/ml) and negative for HCV markers.

Autoantibody detection

Presence of ANA, SMA, anti-LKM1, anti-LC1 and anti-mitochondrial antibodies was initially detected by IIFL on 5 μm frozen sections of in-house rodent multi-organ (kidney, liver and stomach) tissue substrates using as revealing reagent an anti-total human IgG fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugate (Dako Ltd, High Wycombe, Bucks, UK), as previously described [1, 9]. Briefly, diluted sera (1/40) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) were tested on in-house snap-frozen sections of rat liver, kidney and stomach. Positive sera were titred by double dilution to extinction. The patterns of reactivity were assessed under a fluorescence microscope (Orthoplan, Leitz, Wetzlar, Germany). Anti-LKM1, anti-LC1 and anti-SLA reactivity was also evaluated by Western immunoblotting using both human microsomal and cytosolic fraction as antigen sources (Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany). Commercially available ELISA (Euroimmun) were used for the detection of anti-FTCD (anti-LC1) and tRNP(Ser)Sec (anti-SLA) autoantibodies, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Antibody binding titres expressed as optical density (OD) testserum/OD calibrator and extinction values of serum samples exceeding those of the calibrator (OD testserum/OD calibrator > 1) were considered positive.

Inhibition studies

To investigate whether the 58–60 kDa band immunofixed by anti-LC1 is FTCD, inhibition experiments were performed using the anti-LC1 positive serum, diluted at 1/200, and pre-incubated with solid phase recombinant FTCD (Euroimmun), as previously described [31, 32].

Each patient gave informed consent to participate in this study. The Local Ethical Committee of The Medical School, University of Thessaly approved the study protocol.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as percentages (%) or mean ± SD unless otherwise stated. The differences between different groups were compared using t-test, the Mann Whitney U test, χ2, (two by two with Yates' correction) and Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Two-sided p values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results and discussion

Prevalence of various NOSA is summarised in Table 1. Anti-FTCD (anti-LC1) antibodies were present in 6/18 (33%) anti-LKMpos/HCVpos compared to 1/120 (0.83%) anti-LKMneg/HCVpos patients (a 47-years old male patient at the third month of IFN-a treatment with no evidence of aminotransferases flare and without history of extrahepatic immunopathological manifestations) and 0/120 (0%) of the anti-LKM1neg/HBVpos patients (p < 0.001 for both; Figure 1A). By western blot using a human liver cytosolic fraction as substrate, the anti-FTCD positive anti-LKMneg/HCVpos case immunofixed a relatively weak 58–60 kDa band corresponding to LC1 autoantigen (Figure 2, lane 1). This band was almost completely abolished when the reactive serum was pre-incubated with recombinant FTCD as solid phase competitor (Figure 2, lane 2) indicating that is due to anti-FTCD reactivity. Repeat IIFL of this case revealed absence of a pattern typical of anti-LC1; there was no staining of cytoplasm of liver cells with relative sparing of the centrilobular area, even when the serum was tested at dilution of 1/20.
Table 1

Prevalence of non-organ specific autoantibodies detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IIFL) or enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in patients with chronic hepatitis C and B.

 

Anti-LKM1 (IIFL)

Anti-LC1 (ELISA)

Anti-SLA (ELISA)

ANA (IIFL)

SMA (IIFL)

LKM1pos/HCVpos

18/18 (100%)*

6/18 (33%)

0/18 (0%)

5/18 (27.7%)**

6/18 (33%)***

LKM1neg/HCVpos

0/120 (0%)

1/120 (0.8%)

0/120 (0%)

45/120 (37.5%)**

61/120 (50.8%)***

LKM1neg/HBVpos

0/120 (0%)

0/120 (0%)

0/120 (0%)

23/120 (19.2%)**

15/120 (12.5%)***

LKM1, liver kidney microsomal type 1; LC1, liver cytosol type 1; SLA, soluble liver antigen; ANA, anti-nuclear antibody; SMA, smooth muscle antibody; pos, positive; neg, negative; *Confirmed by Western immunoblotting (see Methods section); **Low titers of ANA were detected in the three groups (mean titer: 1/168, 1/148 and 1/140, respectively); ***Low titers of SMA were detected in the three groups (mean titer: 1/134, 1/121 and 1/119, respectively).

Figure 1

(A). ELISA titers of anti-formimino-transferase cyclodeaminase (anti-FTCD) antibodies, known also as anti-liver cytosolic type 1 antibodies (anti-LC1) and (B). titers of anti-UGA tRNA suppressor associated antigenic protein (tRNP(Ser)Sec) antibodies, known also as anti-soluble liver antigen antibodies (anti-SLA) in 18 liver kidney microsomal type 1 (LKM1) positive chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected patients; 120 LKM1 negative chronic HCV infected patients; and 120 LKM1 negative hepatitis B virus (HBV) infected patients. According to the manufacturer's instructions, autoantibody reactivity is considered positive when optical density (OD)test serum/ODcalibrator > 1.

Figure 2

Immunoblot pattern produced by a serum sample from a liver kidney microsomal type 1 (LKM1) negative chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected patient with anti-formimino-transferase cyclodeaminase (FTCD) antibodies on electrophoretically separated human liver homogenate (lane 1). The 58–60 kDa immunofixed band almost completely abolished when the reactive serum was pre-incubated with recombinant FTCD as solid phase competitor (lane 2).

Anti-tRNP(Ser)Sec (anti-SLA) antibodies were not present in any of the HCV (with or without anti-LKM1 reactivity) or HBV infected patients (Figure 1B). Similar data we have obtained when an anti-SLA ELISA of another manufacturer (Inova Diagnostics, San Diego, California, USA) was used (data not shown).

Chronic HCV infection is frequently characterized by an altered immune homeostasis as it has become evident by the high prevalence of NOSA, and in particular SMA and ANA which, according to some reports, exceeds 50% of the infected population [17]. Anti-LKM1 antibody – the serological marker of type 2 AIH- is also detected in up to 11% of the HCV-infected subjects [1, 811]. Under this context, the detection of anti-LC1 and anti-SLA antibodies in a significant proportion of HCV patients in the two recent studies – irrespective of the anti-LKM1 status – [26, 27] could not be a surprising finding as it might further support the autoimmune propensity of the virus.

The findings of the present study however, suggest that commercially available assays are unable to detect anti-LC1 and anti-SLA antibodies in a large number of anti-LKM1 negative patients either with chronic HCV or with chronic HBV infection. On the contrary, we found that a considerable proportion of anti-LKMpos/HCVpos patients (33%) had detectable anti-LC1 antibodies by ELISA, which is in accordance with previous studies from Italy [14].

The question arises as to whether the inability of the detection of anti-LC1 and anti-SLA antibodies by ELISAs in patients with chronic HCV infection is due to the superior sensitivity of the immunoprecipitation assays used by Beland et al [26] and Vitozzi et al [27]. Radioligand assays of higher sensitivity than the conventional assays have increasingly been reported in the autoantibody diagnostic setting of a plethora of autoimmune diseases such as diabetes, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus and AIH [1, 28, 3338]. There are still some reservations however, as to whether this is the sole reason for the discrepant results between ELISAs and immunoprecipitation assays specific for anti-LC1 and anti-SLA detection. First, it has been generally agreed that as equipment becomes more sophisticated, higher diagnostic sensitivity of an assay frequently comes at the expense of a lower specificity [38]. Beland et al [26] and Vitozzi et al [27] argue that this cannot be the case for their immunoprecipitation anti-LC1 and anti-SLA assays because they can detect these autoantibodies in patients with chronic hepatitis C but not in other pathological controls. These investigators, in particular, were unable to detect anti-LC1 in any of the 22 patients with type 1 AIH or the 25 patients with other unrelated chronic liver diseases (which however did not describe in detail).

The focus of the present study was not the validation of the findings of the French/Canadian group. We rather decided to investigate the prevalence of anti-LC1 and anti-SLA in anti-LKM1neg/HCVpos patients by commercial ELISAs and to test their diagnostic utility in the day-to-day clinical practice. Our assumption has been based on the fact that if anti-LC1 and anti-SLA are present in anti-LKM1neg/HCVpos patients and these antibodies can be detected by routinely performed ELISAs, clinicians should be aware and request for their detection. We have found that neither anti-LC1 nor anti-SLA autoantibodies are detectable in anti-LKM1 negative patients with chronic viral hepatitis C or B by ELISAs.

Conclusion

We showed that anti-LC1 and anti-SLA autoantibodies are not detected by conventional assays in the vast majority of patients with chronic viral hepatitis B and C. Based on these results we cannot find any justification for the application of anti-LC1 and anti-SLA tests in the routine laboratory testing of viral hepatitis-related autoantibody serology unless anti-LKM1 antibodies are present in HCV-infected patients. In the latter case, only anti-LC1 screening could be of interest. Exchange of sera and standardization of the methodology employed, whether it is radioligand, western blot or ELISA is urgently warranted to address definitely whether anti-LC1 and anti-SLA autoantibodies are serological markers of chronic hepatitis C.

Abbreviations

AIH: 

autoimmune hepatitis

SMA: 

smooth muscle antibody

ANA: 

antinuclear antibody

anti-LKM1: 

liver kidney microsomal type 1 antibody

IIFL: 

indirect immunofluorescence

anti-LC1: 

liver cytosol type 1 antibody

anti-SLA: 

antibody against soluble liver antigen

HCV: 

hepatitis C virus

HBV: 

hepatitis B virus

FTCD: 

formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase

tRNP(Ser)Sec

UGA tRNA suppressor associated antigenic protein

ELISA: 

enzyme linked immunosorbent assay

IFN-a: 

alpha-interferon.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by a research grant of the Research Committee of the University of Thessaly, Greece (Code no: 2446); C Liaskos was supported by CE.RE.TE.TH and by a scholarship from the Hellenic Association for the Study of the Liver.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine, Academic Liver Unit and Research Laboratory of Internal Medicine, Larissa Medical School, University of Thessaly
(2)
Institute of Biomedical Technology (BIOMED), Center for Research and Technology-Thessaly (CE.RE.TE.TH)

References

  1. Dalekos GN, Makri E, Loges S, Obermayer-Straub P, Zachou K, Tsikrikas T, Schmidt E, Papadamou G, Manns MP: Increased incidence of anti-LKM autoantibodies in a consecutive cohort of hepatitis C patients from central Greece. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002, 14: 35-42. 10.1097/00042737-200201000-00007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Zachou K, Liaskos C, Christodoulou DK, Kardasi M, Papadamou G, Gatselis N, Georgiadou SP, Tsianos EV, Dalekos GN: Anti-cardiolipin antibodies in patients with chronic viral hepatitis are independent of beta2-glycoprotein I cofactor or features of antiphospholipid syndrome. Eur J Clin Invest. 2003, 33: 161-168. 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2003.01110.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gregorio GV, Pensati P, Iorio R, Vegnente A, Mieli-Vergani G, Vergani D: Autoantibody prevalence in children with liver disease due to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Clin Exp Immunol. 1998, 112: 471-476. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1998.00574.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lenzi M, Bellentani S, Saccoccio G, Muratori P, Masutti F, Muratori L, Cassani F, Bianchi FB, Tiribelli C: Prevalence of non-organ-specific autoantibodies and chronic liver disease in the general population: a nested case-control study of the Dionysos cohort. Gut. 1999, 45: 435-441.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Muratori P, Muratori L, Verucchi G, Attard L, Bianchi FB, Lenzi M: Non-organ-specific autoantibodies in children with chronic hepatitis C: clinical significance and impact on interferon treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 2003, 37: 1320-1326. 10.1086/379018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gatselis NK, Georgiadou SP, Tassopoulos N, Zachou K, Liaskos C, Hatzakis A, Dalekos GN: Impact of parietal cell autoantibodies and non-organ-specific autoantibodies on the treatment outcome of patients with hepatitis C virus infection: A pilot study. World J Gastroenterol. 2005, 11: 482-487.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bogdanos DP, Mieli-Vergani G, Vergani D: Non-organ specific autoantibodies in HCV infection: do they matter?. Clin Infect Dis. 2005, 40: 508-510. 10.1086/427293.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Alvarez F, Berg PA, Bianchi FB, Bianchi L, Burroughs AK, Cancado EL, Chapman RW, Cooksley WG, Czaja AJ, Desmet VJ, Donaldson PT, Eddleston AL, Fainboim L, Heathcote J, Homberg JC, Hoofnagle JH, Kakumu S, Krawitt EL, Mackay IR, MacSween RN, Maddrey WC, Manns MP, McFarlane IG, Meyer zum Buschenfelde KH, Zeniya M: International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group Report: review of criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. J Hepatol. 1999, 31: 929-938. 10.1016/S0168-8278(99)80297-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Vergani D, Alvarez F, Bianchi FB, Cancado EL, Mackay IR, Manns MP, Nishioka M, Penner E: Liver autoimmune serology: a consensus statement from the committee for autoimmune serology of the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. J Hepatol. 2004, 41: 677-683. 10.1016/j.jhep.2004.08.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zachou K, Rigopoulou E, Dalekos GN: Autoantibodies and autoantigens in autoimmune hepatitis: important tools in clinical practice and to study pathogenesis of the disease. J Autoimmune Dis. 2004, 1: 2-10.1186/1740-2557-1-2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dalekos GN, Zachou K, Liaskos C, Gatselis N: Autoantibodies and defined target autoantigens in autoimmune hepatitis: an overview. Eur J Intern Med. 2002, 13: 293-303. 10.1016/S0953-6205(02)00089-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Martini E, Abuaf N, Cavalli F, Durand V, Johanet C, Homberg JC: Antibody to liver cytosol (anti-LC1) in patients with autoimmune chronic active hepatitis type 2. Hepatology. 1988, 8: 1662-1666.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Abuaf N, Johanet C, Chretien P, Martini E, Soulier E, Laperche S, Homberg JC: Characterization of the liver cytosol antigen type 1 reacting with autoantibodies in chronic active hepatitis. Hepatology. 1992, 16: 892-898.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lenzi M, Manotti P, Muratori L, Cataleta M, Ballardini G, Cassani F, Bianchi FB: Liver cytosolic 1 antigen-antibody system in type 2 autoimmune hepatitis and hepatitis C virus infection. Gut. 1995, 36: 749-754.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Manns M, Gerken G, Kyriatsoulis A, Staritz M, Meyer zum Büschenfelde K-H: Characterization of a new subgroup of autoimmune chronic active hepatitis by autoantibodies against soluble liver antigen. Lancet. 1987, i: 292-294. 10.1016/S0140-6736(87)92024-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Czaja AJ, Manns MP: The validity and importance of subtypes in autoimmune hepatitis: A point of view. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995, 90: 1206-1211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kanzler S, Weidemann C, Gerken G, Lohr HF, Galle PR, Meyer zum Buschenfelde KH, Lohse AW: Clinical significance of autoantibodies to soluble liver antigen in autoimmune hepatitis. J Hepatol. 1999, 31: 635-640. 10.1016/S0168-8278(99)80342-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ballot E, Homberg JC, Johanet C: Antibodies to soluble liver antigen: an additional marker in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis. J Hepatol. 2000, 33: 208-215. 10.1016/S0168-8278(00)80361-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Manns MP: Antibodies to soluble liver antigen: specific marker of autoimmune hepatitis. J Hepatol. 2000, 33: 326-328. 10.1016/S0168-8278(00)80375-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lapierre P, Hajoui O, Homberg JC, Alvarez F: Formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase is an organ-specific autoantigen recognized by sera of patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Gastroenterology. 1999, 116: 643-649. 10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70186-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Muratori L, Sztul E, Muratori P, Gao Y, Ripalti A, Ponti C, Lenzi M, Landini MP, Bianchi FB: Distinct epitopes on formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase induce autoimmune liver cytosol antibody type 1. Hepatology. 2001, 34: 494-501. 10.1053/jhep.2001.27179.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wies I, Brunner S, Henninger J, Herkel J, Kanzler S, Meyer zum Buschenfelde KH, Lohse AW: Identification of target antigen for SLA/LP autoantibodies in autoimmune hepatitis. Lancet. 2000, 355: 1510-1515. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02166-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Costa M, Rodriguez-Sanchez JL, Czaja AJ, Gelpi C: Isolation and characterization of cDNA encoding the antigenic protein of the human tRNP(Ser)Sec complex recognized by autoantibodies from patients withtype-1 autoimmune hepatitis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2000, 121: 364-374. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01280.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Volkmann M, Martin L, Baurle A, Heid H, Strassburg CP, Trautwein C, Fiehn W, Manns MP: Soluble liver antigen: isolation of a 35-kd recombinant protein (SLA-p35) specifically recognizing sera from patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology. 2001, 33: 591-596. 10.1053/jhep.2001.22218.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Baeres M, Herkel J, Czaja AJ, Wies I, Kanzler S, Cancado EL, Porta G, Nishioka M, Simon T, Daehnrich C, Schlumberger W, Galle PR, Lohse AW: Establishment of standardised SLA/LP immunoassays: specificity for autoimmune hepatitis, worldwide occurrence, and clinical characteristics. Gut. 2002, 51: 259-264. 10.1136/gut.51.2.259.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Beland K, Lapierre P, Marceau G, Alvarez F: Anti-LC1 autoantibodies in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J Autoimmun. 2004, 22: 159-166. 10.1016/j.jaut.2003.11.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Vitozzi S, Lapierre P, Djilali-Saiah I, Marceau G, Beland K, Alvarez F: Anti-soluble liver antigen (SLA) antibodies in chronic HCV infection. Autoimmunity. 2004, 37: 217-222. 10.1080/08916930410001686260.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ma Y, Okamoto M, Thomas MG, Bogdanos DP, Lopes AR, Portmann B, Underhill J, Durr R, Mieli-Vergani G, Vergani D: Antibodies to conformational epitopes of soluble liver antigen define a severe form of autoimmune liver disease. Hepatology. 2002, 35: 658-664. 10.1053/jhep.2002.32092.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Czaja AJ, Shums Z, Norman GL: Frequency and significance of antibodies to soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas in variant autoimmune hepatitis. Autoimmunity. 2002, 35: 475-483. 10.1080/0891693021000054101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Georgiadou SP, Zachou K, Rigopoulou E, Liaskos C, Mina P, Gerovasilis F, Makri E, Dalekos GN: Occult hepatitis B virus infection in Greek patients with chronic hepatitis C and in patients with diverse nonviral hepatic diseases. J Viral Hepat. 2004, 11: 358-365. 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2004.00513.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Bogdanos DP, Baum H, Gunsar F, Arioli D, Polymeros D, Ma Y, Burroughs AK, Vergani D: Extensive homology between the major immunodominant mitochondrial antigen in primary biliary cirrhosis and Helicobacter pylori does not lead to immunological cross-reactivity. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004, 39: 981-7. 10.1080/00365520410003236.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Bogdanos DP, Bianchi I, Ma Y, Mitry RR, Mieli-Vergani G, Vergani D: Targets of antibodies to soluble liver antigen in patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Clin Chem. 2004, 50: 682-683. 10.1373/clinchem.2003.027730.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Dalekos GN, Wedemeyer H, Obermayer-Straub P, Kayser A, Barut A, Frank H, Manns MP: Epitope mapping of cytochrome P4502D6 autoantigen in patients with chronic hepatitis C during alpha-interferon treatment. J Hepatol. 1999, 30: 366-375. 10.1016/S0168-8278(99)80092-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Bonifacio E, Lampasona V, Genovese S, Ferrari M, Bosi E: Identification of protein tyrosine phosphatase-like IA2 (islet cell antigen 512) as the insulin-dependent diabetes-related 37/40K autoantigen and a target of islet-cell antibodies. J Immunol. 1995, 155: 5419-5426.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Yamamoto AM, Johanet C, Duclos-Vallee JC, Bustarret FA, Alvarez F, Homberg JC, Bach JF: A new approach to cytochrome CYP2D6 antibody detection in autoimmune hepatitis type-2 (AIH-2) and chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection: a sensitive and quantitative radioligand assay. Clin Exp Immunol. 1997, 108: 396-400. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1997.4071302.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ma Y, Gregorio G, Gaken J, Muratori L, Bianchi FB, Mieli-Vergani G, Vergani D: Establishment of a novel radioligand assay using eukaryotically expressed cytochrome P4502D6 for the measurement of liver kidney microsomal type 1 antibody in patients with autoimmune hepatitis and hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol. 1997, 26: 1396-1402. 10.1016/S0168-8278(97)80477-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kawasaki E, Eisenbarth GS: High-throughput radioassays for autoantibodies to recombinant autoantigens. Front Biosci. 2000, 5: E181-190.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wiik AS, Gordon TP, Kavanaugh AF, Lahita RG, Reeves W, van Venrooij WJ, Wilson MR, Fritzler M: Cutting edge diagnostics in rheumatology: the role of patients, clinicians, and laboratory scientists in optimizing the use of autoimmune serology. Arthritis Rheum. 2004, 51: 291-298. 10.1002/art.20229.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Rigopoulou et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement